An article I often go back to is the Minton & Myers (2008) one on cognitive-emotional styles (CES), especially as a complement to the relevant Ivey et al. (2005) book chapter. What really stood out about this article was that it transcended all specific counseling interventions by first prioritizing and identifying each client’s orientation to counseling, not unlike evaluating a client’s stage of change. Valuable information in the article included identifying a client’s specific expression, such as sensorimotor- or narrative-based to abstract or dialectical; common challenges of each CES; and techniques to round out the perspective of each client through matching and mis-matching styles. This article was meaningful because it is useful for every client, and it was especially meaningful to me in my work with clients experiencing crisis and trauma. Often, a client’s “healing journey” is perceived by them as a linear process, as if they are not healed if they can’t speak like a psychology expert speaks on trauma, and this article helped me appreciate healing as multifaceted and holistic.